1.7 Complex EM Properties
For many geophysical
applications we neglect the permittivity (e
or Ke) term and assume the magnetic permeability is that
of free space, i.e., Km = 1. This cannot be done for
ground penetrating radar, GPR. In this case we must
treat the total current density, JT
as
Here, JC
is the same current density, J defined earlier, however,
in the context here it is usually referred to as the conduction
current density to distinguish it from the displacement current
density, ∂D/∂t.
By assuming that the
time dependency of all fields is e+iwt
we see that
| JT
= JC + iwD |
(1.7.2) |
=
(s + iwe)E. |
(1.7.3) |
(Using the exponential,
e+iwt
to express a sinusoidal variation with time is discussed in Appendix
A). Equation 1.7.3 allows a generalized complex expression of Ohm's
law (equation 1.5.1). This uses the definition of complex conductivity,
s* as
and yields
where s'
= s and s''
= we
are the real and imaginary parts of the complex conductivity, s*
respectively. A convenient way to express the relative amount of
conduction current versus displacement current is the loss tangent,
tan d.
| tan
d
= s / we
= |
| conduction
current density |
 |
| displacement
current density |
|
|
(1.7.6) |
Another way to express
JT is to modify the JT equation
1.7.3 above as
| JT |
= iw(s
/ iw
+ e)E |
|
| |
=
iw(e
- is
/ w)E |
|
| |
= iwe*E |
(1.7.7) |
This
leads to the definition of complex electric permittivity,
e* (von Hippel, 1954) as
where e'
and e'' are the real and imaginary parts
of the complex permittivity, e*, respectively.
This allows the alternate expression of the loss tangent to be
The complex dielectric
constant, K* follows as
| K* |
= e*/eo |
|
| |
= K'
– iK''. |
(1.7.10) |
Davis and Annan (1989)
prefer to separate the imaginary part of the dielectric constant
into two parts: 1) a dc component of conductivity sdc
and 2) a high frequency contribution, K''. Then
| K* |
= K'
– iK''' |
|
| |
= K'
+ i(K'' + sdc/we0) |
(1.7.11) |
The relations above
can be represented in the complex plane. Figure 1.9 a, b, and c
contain such examples.
| Figure 1.9 Complex graphical representations
of a) total current density, JT, b) conductivity,
s*, and c) dielectric constant, K*. |
Appendix A
Exponential Notation
of Time
The widespread use of
complex notation in electromagnetics (and in other branches of physics)
and Euler’s formula leads to an effective shorthand for expressing
sinusoidal variations of time. Using Euler’s formula we can
write
| e+iwt
= cos wt + i sin wt |
(A.1) |
which leads to
and
where Im and Re refer
to the imaginary and real parts, respectively.
These “sinusoidal”
time variations are often simply expressed by saying that the time
dependency is e+iwt (or e-iwt
). It does not mean that the time dependency is complex. The resulting
expression can be returned to a real one by extracting the real
or imaginary part in the end. This is acceptable as long as various
manipulations involve only addition, subtraction, differentiation,
or integration where the real and imaginary parts do not mix. However,
usually the final expression is simply left in exponential form.
Using the exponential
form is preferred because the algebra of complex exponentials is
easier to work with compared to sines and cosines. For example,
the differentiation operation d/dt is just a multiplication by +iwt.
That is,
| d/dt
(e+iwt ) = iw
e+iwt . |
(A.4) |
To illustrate the use
of complex exponential notation, again consider the earlier equation
1.2.6, i.e.,
| V =
IR + L dI/dt + q/C |
(A.5) |
with
Equation A.5 becomes
| V =
IR +I iwL – iI/wC |
(A.7) |
after the integration
| q |
= integral
of IOeiwtdt |
|
| |
= -iI
/ w |
(A.8) |
Now, upon taking the
imaginary part of the expression for V after inserting
| I
= Io e+iwt
= Io (cos wt + i sin wt) |
(A.9) |
we have
| V =
Io R sin wt + Io
wL cos wt
- Io/wC cos wt |
(A.7) |
which is the identical
to the expression we derived earlier (equation 1.2.10) using
I = Io sin wt.
|