HOME

The Nate Harrison Historical Archaeology Project

Palomar Mountain - San Diego County, California
The Official Site of the SDSU Historical Archaeology Field School

 







ARCHAEOLOGY

Abridged Research Design

The Nate Harrison Historical Archaeology project began with two sets of research questions. The first was individualistic in terms of the singularity of the site and its primary resident. This initial set of queries asked:

• Is this Nate Harrison’s homestead?

• Does the site have a date range of ca. 1850-1920 based on the archaeological remains?

• Is there archaeological evidence of a pre- or post-Harrison occupation at the site?

• Are the visible stones that slightly protrude out of the site area in fact remnants of the foundations to the Harrison cabin?

• How do insights gleaned from this site compare with the established stories of Harrison’s life?


The second set of research questions focused more on comparative regional analyses. Attempting to broaden current investigations into the multi-ethnic settlement patterns of urban San Diegans during the late 1800s and early 1900s, this project examines rural San Diego and then contrasts the two regions. It poses questions such as:

• What does the historical archaeology reveal about everyday life in San Diego County’s rural frontier community during the late 19th and early 20th centuries?

• What were the similarities and differences between urban and rural communities in San Diego County during this time?

• How do the archaeological patterns compare between the regions when looking at specific sites with different ethnicities, genders, or classes?

• Is it possible to create an archaeological grammar relating to multi-ethnic settlement patterns in San Diego County on the basis of relative insights uncovered through the entire region’s cumulative historical excavations?


The following report summarizes the 2004 summer field excavations at the Nate Harrison site. It includes an overview of historical background relating to Nate Harrison, details the archaeological methodology employed at the site and in the lab, provides preliminary analyses and interpretations, and offers a complete inventory of the exhumed artifacts. In synthesizing the initial year of historical and archaeological work on the Nate Harrison Historical Archaeology project, this annual publication serves as the 2004-2005 interim technical report.

Archaeological Background

An historic resource record search conducted at the South Coastal Information Center produced only one report for the area associated with Harrison's mountain property. This report stated that archaeologists conducted a site survey in April of 1959. They described a site entirely separate from the Harrison cabin area as being a “summer village site of Pauma Indians” (True 1959:1). The 1959 survey concentrated on two areas, both dealing with prehistoric Native-American occupation. These areas contained a deep midden and a large bedrock-mortar site. The 1959 archaeological investigations resulted in the recovery of 152 artifacts during the survey, all of which were Native American in origin. The report mentioned neither the Harrison cabin nor the presence of any historical materials in the area. It did remark, however, that, “an effort should be made to get into this site before it is taken over by TOURISTS” (capitalization original, True 1959:1).

Harrison's cabin is located in an area associated with a lengthy Native-American occupation. Palomar Mountain is currently surrounded by present day Native-American reservations occupied by La Jolla, Pala, Pauma, and Rincon Indians. The Pauma Indians are “an interior variant of the La Jolla culture . . . developed due to the silting of coastal lagoons which forced the inhabitants to relocate in interior valleys and canyons” (Hoover 1978:4). Palomar Mountain was once the site of acorn gathering and processing by prehistoric indigenous populations due to the proliferation of oak groves located on the mountain. Ethnographically, the Pauma Indians are part of Luiseño territory, who inhabited a large area “of about 1,500 square miles in coastal southern California from Aliso Creek in the north to Aqua Hedionda Creek in the south. . . extend[ing] inland to Santiago Peak, down the eastern side of Elsinor Valley to Mt. Palomar, and southwest to the sea” (Hoover 1978:6). Historically, the Pauma Indians are closely related to Palomar Mountain, beginning with land grants by the Mexican government. The Pauma rancheria was a 13,300-acre grant deeded to Jose Antonio Serrano that was later patented on August 29, 1871 (Hoover 1978:9). With the establishment of California and the subsequent control of the United States government, the land was eventually designated as both Pauma and Yaima Reservations on August 18, 1892 (Hoover 1978:11). The 1896 Sickler survey map further illustrated the spatial association between Pauma and Palomar Mountain, citing the location of the mapped road as “a point in the Pauma Townsite to the Summit of Palomar Mtn” (Sickler 1896). The Pauma Ranch is clearly demarcated on the western side of the map (See figure 17).

Dr. Mallios contacted the State of California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to request a record search of the sacred land file. The record search failed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. Mallios then contacted every indigenous group on the NAHC list in an attempt to ascertain any additional information regarding cultural resources in the project area. None responded to Mallios’s inquiry.

There was concern at the outset of the Nate Harrison Historical Archaeology Project that the cabin area had been repeatedly looted. David Ross’s 1998 series of articles in The Daily Roadrunner revealed that non-archaeologists used metal detectors extensively at the site. Ross wrote, “It seems that for years he (the former landowner) and his family have used a metal detector around the ruins of Nate's house, and found scads of stuff near his front door . . . Most of it, of course, is of little interest. But, over the years they have come up with quite a collection of items that give fascinating little glimpses into life in another age” (Ross 1998:IV4). Accompanying Ross’s article are two photographs of a picnic table covered with artifacts unearthed from around Harrison's cabin (Figures 67 and 68). In addition, multiple letters in the Kirby Collection from author Robert Melvin to the previous landowner detail multiple plans to dig for artifacts at the site.

In 2002, Mallios and Stroud contacted the current landowners, James and Hannah Kirby, in order to determine if the site had been significantly disturbed and if an excavation was feasible. During Mallios and Stroud’s first trip to the property, the Kirbys showed the SDSU archaeologists the remains of what was thought to be Nate Harrison's cabin. All that remained at the apparent site was the outline of a foundation for a small amorphous structure (Figures 69-72). The area was only marginally visible as it was overgrown with large bushy plants, weeds, and small trees. The remaining stones formed haphazard lines, and there was evidence that the walls may have fallen, as rocks had seemingly tumbled both into the center of the remains and around the exterior. The ground surface in the center of the structure was uneven. The foundation rested on a fairly level surface that was surrounded by a lower cut or trail to the south and a hillside rising on the north and east sides. There was no evidence of historical material on the ground surface.

After explaining the goals of the project and intended extent of the archaeological excavations, the Kirbys granted permission for the Nate Harrison Historical Archaeology Project to be conducted on their property. Having gained permission from the landowners, Mallios was then granted permission to conduct a three-week historical archaeology field school during the summer session of the 2004 school year by Dr. Paul Wong, the Dean of the College of Arts and Letters at San Diego State University.

Archaeological Field Methods

Archaeological Laboratory Methods

2004 Excavation Results

Analyses

Selected Artifacts

Interpretations and Conclusions

 

History | Archaeology | Photographs | Video | Field School | Publications | Contact

copyright © 2006 San Diego State University Anthropology