Ann M. Johns

Home | Professional Activities | Teaching | Consulting & Service | Curriculum Projects | Suggested Reading


The SDSU of the Future
Ann M. Johns

[This opinion piece appear in the San Diego Union-Tribune, March 24, 2004]


What should the educational and service roles of San Diego State University be? How should SDSU, the most comprehensive California State University (CSU) in the region, balance teaching and research, graduate and undergraduate programs, and its regional, state, and international interests?


The answers to these questions were clear when our family arrived in San Diego nearly forty years ago: SDSU was a teaching institution devoted principally to serving local undergraduates. Students with baccalaureate degrees generally remained in the region, so our local businesses, educational institutions, and political offices are now filled with more than 100,000 SDSU alumni. The campus also offered a few region-appropriate graduate programs in the 1960s, including those credentialing public school teachers.


In the past twenty years or so––and with accelerating speed in the last ten—the university has shifted its priorities dramatically. The campus administration has encouraged departments to propose doctoral programs, with plans to have more than twenty-five in place during the coming years. New tenure-track faculty are hired principally for their research potential; their tenure depends, in large part, upon their abilities to bring prestige to the campus through grants, publications, and even private donations. Because major efforts are underway to enhance graduate education, undergraduates are finding themselves in much larger classrooms, with many General Education courses enrolling 100, 200, and even 500 students. In recent years, up to 40% of the General Education classes have been taught by non-tenured faculty or teaching assistants, since permanent faculty must devote time to their laboratories, advanced students, or their professional growth.


To achieve its goal of “world-class status,” the university is determined to shed its regional standing and recruit more students from other parts of the state, the nation, and the world. (University President Stephen Weber uses the term “import” rather than recruit, according to Neil Morgan, San Diego Union-Tribune, March 3, 2004.) Since the campus is turning away more than 10,000 applicants each year, local students must be discouraged from attending. So because it is a CSU mandate that qualified local students be given priority, the campus has established a Dual Admissions Program: those who are CSU qualified but do not achieve sufficiently high scores on English or math placement examinations are accepted, but they must attend the already overburdened community colleges until they have met the designated competencies. Of the 860 students who were designated as Dual Admits in fall 2002, 303 attended community college classes, and 180 were fully enrolled on the SDSU campus in fall 2003, a 21% success rate. Though the campus continues to be involved in regional educational efforts such as the City Heights Project and Compact for Success (with the Sweetwater Union High School District), a large number of students applying from high schools in these areas are designated Dual Admits or rejected outright. But it must be more than Dual Admission that is discouraging students in the region from attending. In fall 1999, 43.9% of the freshman class came from San Diego or Imperial Counties; by fall 2002, this percentage had declined to 35.8%.


Its other world-class goal, to become a top research institution, will also divert the campus from its original mission; and even if this goal were a worthy one, it is unlikely to be realized. Because the campus is part of the CSU system, SDSU is required to have a higher student-faculty ratio than the University of California (UC) campuses, and its doctoral degrees can only be offered in conjunction with doctoral granting institutions. Particularly in these times of severe budget cuts, many campus departments cannot afford to give faculty the kinds of travel, released time, or grant monies required to pursue extensive research.


Are these efforts to import large numbers of students and “increase intellectual capital” in the region appropriate for SDSU? Are the benefits accrued worth a decline in local student enrollment and diversion of funds from undergraduate education? At a time when business leaders in the region are complaining that SDSU graduates have trouble communicating, are larger undergraduate classes that result in fewer writing assignments and speaking opportunities acceptable to the community?


In a recent Academe article, Philip G. Altbach noted that efforts to achieve world- class status by universities that are not well-endowed or research-designated can “divert energy and resources from more important—and more realistic—goals.” Could this diversion of efforts be the reason why SDSU is still found in the fourth tier of the annual U. S. News and World Report campus poll, well below a number of its sister CSU campuses?


At this point, it would be inappropriate for the campus to return to policies of the 1960s. However, there may be a middle way: rather than attempting to attain UC-like, world-class status, SDSU could refashion itself as an outstanding regional campus. It could be more selective about its doctoral programs, advancing only those that are region-appropriate. At the same time, it could enhance recruitment of CSU-qualified local students, providing additional access and support to young people already in the region, a number of whom, for family or financial reasons, cannot leave to attend another CSU. Those students could bring a richness not measured by test scores to the campus—and to the community after graduation.


Ann M. Johns is Professor Emerita of Linguistics and Writing Studies at San Diego State University. During her more than 30 years on campus, she founded and directed the American Language Institute and the Center for Teaching and Learning and co-founded the Freshman Success Program, in addition to conducting research and teaching at several academic levels. In 1987, and again in 1999, she was awarded a “Monty” from the SDSU Alumni and Associates for outstanding contributions to the university.

 

Home | Professional Activities | Teaching | Consulting & Service | Suggested Reading